Controversy Surrounds 'Assassin's Creed: Shadows' for Featuring Black Samurai Yasuke
Historic fantasy 'Assassin's Creed' sparks bitter debate over black samurai 🔗
The latest installment of the "Assassin's Creed" video game series, titled "Shadows," set in 16th-century feudal Japan, has sparked controversy over its portrayal of a black samurai, Yasuke. While the game is praised for its historical accuracy, the decision to feature Yasuke as a playable character has led to significant debate, with over 100,000 signatures on a petition arguing against the lack of cultural respect. Historians have differing opinions on Yasuke's historical status, with some emphasizing his real existence but questioning his qualifications as a samurai. The controversy has been intensified by social media reactions and accusations of an organized campaign against the game's narrative choice. Additionally, discussions around the depiction of Japan's history remain sensitive, especially regarding religious and cultural representations.
What is the main controversy surrounding "Assassin's Creed: Shadows"?
The main controversy is the inclusion of a black samurai, Yasuke, as a playable character, which has led to debates about historical accuracy and cultural respect.
How did historians respond to the portrayal of Yasuke?
Historians are divided; some support the creative choice, noting Yasuke's real existence, while others argue that there is insufficient evidence to classify him as a samurai based on historical records.
What effects did social media have on the game's reception?
Social media amplified the controversy, with claims of an organized campaign influencing public opinion and leading to a significant amount of negative coverage regarding the game's narrative choices.