The Reality of NaNoWriMo: Quality vs. Quantity in Writing
Just Because You Love Books, Doesn't Mean You Have To Write One 🔗
Writing a novel may seem appealing, especially with initiatives like National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) encouraging aspiring authors. However, the reality is that many manuscripts go unread and unpublished, with a significant number of published works failing commercially. While NaNoWriMo provides community support and motivation, it often leads to a flood of poorly edited submissions, raising concerns about the quality of writing produced in a short time. Many literary professionals suggest that aspiring writers should prioritize reading over writing to develop their skills and understanding of the craft. Ultimately, enjoying books does not necessitate writing one; reading widely enriches the literary landscape more than contributing more manuscripts.
What is NaNoWriMo?
NaNoWriMo, or National Novel Writing Month, is an initiative that challenges participants to write a novel draft of over 50,000 words in the month of November. Founded in 1999, it has grown into a popular community event.
Why is there skepticism about the quality of works produced during NaNoWriMo?
Many believe that the focus on quantity over quality leads to a surge of poorly edited manuscripts. Literary agents often prefer to work with writers who have honed their skills over time rather than those who rush to complete a draft in a month.
What should aspiring writers focus on instead of writing a novel?
Aspiring writers are encouraged to read extensively in their chosen genres to understand tropes and develop their writing skills. Reading is considered essential for producing quality work and engaging with the literary community.