Rethinking Human Nature: The Misconception of Savage Instincts
Freedom Essay 14 | Dishonest biology leads to our extinction 🔗
Jeremy Griffith's essay highlights the dangers of "dishonest biology," particularly the notion of "savage instincts" as an explanation for human behavior. Griffith argues that this belief leads to misunderstandings about our true nature, which is rooted in cooperative and loving instincts rather than selfish and aggressive ones. He critiques both right-wing and left-wing ideologies for perpetuating the idea that humans are innately savage and explains how this has profound implications for society, contributing to a culture that prioritizes dogma over understanding. The essay ultimately calls for a deeper exploration of the human condition, emphasizing that genuine understanding can heal our psychological issues and transform humanity.
What does Jeremy Griffith argue about the concept of "savage instincts"?
Griffith argues that the idea of "savage instincts" is a misleading explanation for human behavior, suggesting instead that humans possess cooperative and loving instincts. This misunderstanding contributes to a culture that promotes dogma rather than genuine understanding.
How does Griffith view the impact of left-wing and right-wing ideologies?
Griffith believes that both left-wing and right-wing ideologies misuse the concept of "savage instincts" to justify their beliefs, leading to a stagnation in understanding human behavior and ultimately contributing to societal issues.
What is the solution Griffith proposes for the issues caused by misunderstanding human behavior?
Griffith advocates for a deeper understanding of the human condition, arguing that this knowledge can heal psychological issues and facilitate a transformation in human behavior, moving away from dogmatic beliefs.