Noah Smith's Evolving Perspective on Libertarianism in the Trump Era
Noah Smith: I owe libertarians an apology đź”—
Noah Smith reflects on his evolving perspective toward libertarianism in light of contemporary political dynamics, particularly during the Trump era. Initially dismissive of libertarian ideas, he now acknowledges their relevance as a counterbalance to authoritarian trends. Smith differentiates between "thin" libertarianism, which focuses solely on state coercion, and "thick" libertarianism, which considers broader institutional constraints. He discusses the historical backdrop that shaped libertarian thought and critiques both major political parties for their failure to embrace libertarian principles. Smith emphasizes the importance of intellectual development within the libertarian movement and highlights the potential for libertarian ideas to thrive in future political discourse.
- Smith's shift from skepticism to appreciation for libertarianism amid rising authoritarianism.
- Differentiation between "thin" and "thick" libertarianism.
- Critique of both major parties for neglecting libertarian principles.
- Advocacy for intellectual development within the libertarian movement.
What prompted Noah Smith to reconsider his views on libertarianism?
Smith reevaluated libertarianism due to the increasing authoritarianism and populist protectionism seen in recent politics, particularly during Trump's presidency.
How does Smith differentiate between thin and thick libertarianism?
Smith describes thin libertarianism as focusing only on state coercion while thick libertarianism includes a broader consideration of institutional and corporate constraints on freedom.
What does Smith suggest libertarians should focus on moving forward?
He encourages libertarians to engage in intellectual development and to think creatively about how their ideas can be relevant in the current political landscape, advocating for a return to the "intellectual wilderness" for growth and innovation.