Rethinking the Prospect of Global Nuclear War

The text argues that despite the perceived threat of global nuclear war, worrying about it is not productive. The author compares nuclear war to asteroid collisions, stating that both are low-probability, high-impact events. While nuclear war is within human control and can be averted, it has also shaped global governance and maintained peace. The author contends that living with the prospect of nuclear war is preferable to disarmament, as it ensures global stability. Additionally, the text suggests that nuclear consolidation, such as within NATO, could make the world safer. Ultimately, the author concludes that worrying about nuclear war is not necessary if the prospect of disarmament is off the table.

• Global nuclear war is likened to a low-probability, high-impact event, similar to asteroid collisions
• Human control over nuclear weapons and their impact on global governance and peace are highlighted
• The preference for living with the prospect of nuclear war over disarmament is emphasized
• The potential benefits of nuclear consolidation, particularly within NATO, are mentioned