States' Rights vs. Federal Law: The DOJ's Misinterpretation of Voter Roll Regulations
The DOJ Is Wrong: Federal Law Doesn’t Prevent States From Removing Aliens From Voter Rolls 🔗
![The Biden-Harris Justice Department is wrong in claiming that federal law bars Virginia and other states from removing aliens from their voter rolls. And if the law DOJ cites is misinterpreted by a court to agree with the agency’s erroneous claim, then the law likely would be unconstitutional. The Justice Department sued Virginia after it removed the names of […]](https://pricklypear.news/wp-content/uploads/voter-fraud.jpg "The Biden-Harris Justice Department is wrong in claiming that federal law bars Virginia and other states from removing aliens from their voter rolls. And if the law DOJ cites is misinterpreted by a court to agree with the agency’s erroneous claim, then the law likely would be unconstitutional. The Justice Department sued Virginia after it removed the names of […]")
The article argues that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is incorrect in claiming that federal law prevents states like Virginia and Alabama from removing non-citizens from their voter rolls. It highlights that the DOJ's interpretation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) is flawed, particularly regarding the 90-day deadline for removing voters before an election. This deadline does not apply to non-citizens who were improperly registered. The piece cites court rulings that support the idea that states can remove ineligible voters, including non-citizens, without violating federal law. It calls for Virginia and Alabama to stand firm against the DOJ's legal actions to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
- The DOJ claims that federal law bars states from removing non-citizens from voter rolls.
- The article argues this interpretation is incorrect, especially concerning the NVRA's 90-day removal deadline.
- Court rulings indicate states can remove non-citizens who were never eligible to vote.
- The piece encourages states to challenge the DOJ's position to protect election integrity.
What is the main argument of the article regarding the DOJ's claims?
The article argues that the DOJ is wrong in stating that federal law prevents states from removing non-citizens from their voter rolls, highlighting that the law does not apply to those who were never eligible to register.
What does the article say about the 90-day deadline in the NVRA?
It explains that the 90-day deadline for removing names from voter rolls only applies to individuals who have moved and does not apply to non-citizens who were improperly registered.
Why does the article call for states like Virginia and Alabama to challenge the DOJ?
The article urges these states to fight against the DOJ's claims to maintain the security and integrity of the electoral process and to protect voters from foreign interference.