Controversy Over Adobe's Updated Terms of Service
Adobe Says It Won’t Train AI Using Artists’ Work. Creatives Aren’t Convinced 🔗
The text discusses the controversy surrounding Adobe's updated terms of service, which initially allowed the company to access user content for training its AI, known as Firefly. The ambiguous language raised concerns among artists about potential misuse of their work, especially in light of past instances where Adobe allegedly used artists' work without consent. Despite Adobe's clarification that it will not train Firefly on user content, skepticism remains among artists. The text also highlights the broader issue of nonconsensual use and monetization of copyrighted work by generative AI models, leading some artists to consider alternative software tools. Additionally, it mentions efforts by both Adobe and external organizations to address concerns around intellectual property theft and protect artists' rights.
- Adobe's updated terms of service initially allowed access to user content for training its AI, leading to concerns among artists
- Past instances of alleged unauthorized use of artists' work by Adobe raised skepticism about the company's intentions
- Some artists are considering alternatives to Adobe's software due to concerns about the nonconsensual use of their work
- Efforts by Adobe and external organizations to protect artists' rights and address intellectual property theft are mentioned