Understanding Database Normalization and Trade-Offs
Over-normalization is bad for you 🔗
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4012b/4012bd03cd3ea6bbafc142cea864935521ae092d" alt="I took a real beating with my previous post where I argued against excessive normalization on the grounds that it increases complexity and inflexibility, and thus makes the application design more difficult. Whenever people get angry enough to post comments on a post of mine, I conclude that I am on I took a real beating with my previous post where I argued against excessive normalization on the grounds that it increases complexity and inflexibility, and thus makes the application design more difficult. Whenever people get angry enough to post comments on a post of mine, I conclude that I am on"
The text argues against excessive normalization in database design, highlighting the potential drawbacks and trade-offs. It discusses the efficiency of storage in normalized and non-normalized tables, the pros and cons of each approach, and the trade-off between flexibility and safety. The author questions the documented trade-offs of complex database schemas and advocates for awareness of the trade-offs involved in normalization. Additionally, the text mentions the appeal of NoSQL for developers due to strong data independence and suggests that database views can achieve a similar level of data independence.
- The text argues against excessive normalization in database design
- Discusses the efficiency of storage in normalized and non-normalized tables
- Highlights the trade-off between flexibility and safety in database design
- Questions the documented trade-offs of complex database schemas
- Advocates for awareness of the trade-offs involved in normalization
- Mentions the appeal of NoSQL for developers due to strong data independence
- Suggests that database views can achieve a similar level of data independence