Chopper Discusses Diddy's Legal Troubles and Industry Insights
Diddy ex Artist Chopper REVEAL what Gene Deal & Jaguar Wright said that was CORRECT about Diddy! 🔗
00:00 Introduction
Chopper, a former artist associated with Diddy, shares his thoughts on claims made by Jaguar Wright and Gene Deal about Diddy, emphasizing their accuracy and providing insights into the music industry.
01:15 Money and Legal Issues
Chopper discusses the financial aspects of his experience on "Making the Band," claiming that the group is owed $30 million, which was paid to Diddy by Viacom. He highlights the disparity in earnings from the DVD sales, noting they received nothing despite selling millions of copies.
02:30 Opinions on Jaguar Wright
Chopper expresses skepticism about Jaguar Wright's credibility, suggesting she exaggerates. He contrasts her statements with those of Gene Deal, whom he believes speaks truthfully about his experiences with Diddy.
04:00 Insights on Diddy’s Legal Troubles
Chopper speculates on the ongoing legal cases against Diddy, indicating that the severity of the allegations suggests serious outcomes. He reflects on the nature of the charges and nuances surrounding sex trafficking laws, especially in relation to race.
06:45 The Nature of Allegations
Chopper discusses the perception of legal actions against Diddy, suggesting that they may stem from a sense of remorse or opportunism rather than actual victimization, as many involved had consented to their circumstances.
What does Chopper say about the money owed to the band?
Chopper claims the band is owed $30 million, stating that Viacom paid Diddy for their work, but the band received nothing from the DVD sales despite selling 15 million copies.
How does Chopper view Jaguar Wright’s statements?
Chopper believes Jaguar exaggerates and lacks enough experience in the industry to make credible claims about Diddy, contrasting her views with those of Gene Deal, whom he trusts.
What are Chopper's thoughts on Diddy's legal issues?
Chopper thinks the legal troubles Diddy faces could lead to serious consequences, suggesting that the nature of the charges reflects systemic issues related to race and how the law treats different individuals.