Critique of AP's Lawsuit Against the White House Over Gulf Naming
The article critiques the Associated Press (AP) for its ongoing lawsuit against the White House over the naming of the Gulf of America, previously known as the Gulf of Mexico. The author argues that AP's insistence on using specific language reflects a broader agenda in journalism that prioritizes political correctness over factual reporting. The piece highlights the tensions between the White House and various media outlets, suggesting that the AP's complaints are more about prestige than journalistic integrity. The author also points out the absurdity of the situation, suggesting that the AP is more concerned with naming conventions than significant issues, and emphasizes the potential consequences of AP's policies on language and journalism.
What is the main issue between the Associated Press and the White House?
The main issue is the AP's insistence on calling the Gulf of America "the Gulf of Mexico," leading to a lawsuit against the White House for restricting their access to presidential events.
How does the author view the AP's complaint?
The author views the AP's complaint as childish and self-serving, arguing that it reflects a broader trend in journalism to prioritize political correctness over objective reporting.
What does the article suggest about the future of the AP?
The article suggests that the AP's "woke" stance could lead to its decline in credibility and influence, indicating that it may face significant challenges moving forward.