Controversial Claims Surrounding the Origin of 'COVID-19' Terminology
The text presents a controversial argument suggesting that the term "COVID-19" was in use prior to its official announcement by the World Health Organization (WHO) in February 2020. It alleges that evidence points to the term being associated with activities and contracts involving the U.S. Department of Defense, private equity connections to the Bidens, and biolabs in Ukraine as early as 2017. The author claims that this foreknowledge indicates potential criminal behavior and premeditation related to the pandemic narrative. The analysis further explores the ties between various organizations and individuals, including Metabiota, which the text claims connects the Bidens to the development and management of pandemic-related programs.
- The term "COVID-19" was first used by WHO on February 11, 2020, but evidence suggests it was referenced as early as 2017.
- Contracts involving the Department of Defense and private companies like Black & Veatch and Metabiota are discussed, highlighting their ties to the Bidens.
- The text posits that the use of "COVID-19" before its official introduction indicates a constructed narrative and potential enterprise fraud.
What evidence is presented regarding the term "COVID-19"?
Evidence suggests that "COVID-19" was ordered in supplies and test kits as early as 2017, contradicting its first official use by WHO in February 2020.
How are the Bidens connected to the alleged COVID-19 narrative?
The text claims that Hunter and Joe Biden are linked to Metabiota through private equity, implicating them in the contractual dealings related to biolabs and pandemic responses.
What organizations are mentioned in relation to the COVID-19 narrative?
Organizations such as the U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), Black & Veatch, and Metabiota are cited as key players in the alleged premeditated actions surrounding COVID-19.