Plagiarism Allegations Surface Against Kamala Harris's 'Smart on Crime'
NYT Withheld Full Harris Plagiarism Report From Expert, Who Admits It's 'More Serious' 🔗
Allegations of plagiarism have emerged regarding Vice President Kamala Harris's book, "Smart on Crime," with a particular focus on two paragraphs copied from Wikipedia without citation. The New York Times featured plagiarism expert Jonathan Bailey, who initially downplayed the seriousness of the claims but later acknowledged that the situation was more severe than he first indicated. He emphasized that while the plagiarism is problematic, it stems from sloppy writing habits rather than malicious intent. Bailey pointed out that many politicians often have low expectations for originality in their work. Overall, the report highlights ongoing issues with writing standards and plagiarism practices.
What is the main allegation against Kamala Harris's book?
The main allegation is that her book contains two paragraphs copied from Wikipedia without citation, which constitutes plagiarism.
How did the New York Times handle the plagiarism report?
The New York Times did not provide the full plagiarism report to expert Jonathan Bailey, leading him to initially downplay the severity of the allegations.
What did Jonathan Bailey conclude about the plagiarism found in Harris's book?
Bailey concluded that while there are serious issues with the book's content, they reflect sloppy writing habits rather than an intent to defraud. He also noted that many politicians have low expectations for originality in their work.